당원게시판

당원광장 / 당원게시판
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄
뉴욕대 누리엘 루비니교수가 그동안 얼마나 정확하게 예언해 왔는지, 그리고 앞으로 어떻게 진단하고 있는지에 관한 글입니다.  맨 뒤에 제가 끄적거렸던 메모만 보셔도 됩니다.

글 쓰기 싫어서 온갖 짓을 다하고 있다는...

****

 

An economic Cassandra whose predictions are coming true

By Stephen Mihm The New York Times

Saturday, August 16, 2008


On Sept. 7, 2006, Nouriel Roubini, an economics professor at New York University, stood before an audience of economists at the International Monetary Fund and announced that a crisis was brewing. In the coming months and years, he warned, the United States was likely to face a once-in-a-lifetime housing bust, an oil shock, sharply declining consumer confidence and, ultimately, a deep recession.



He laid out a bleak sequence of events: homeowners defaulting on mortgages, trillions of dollars of mortgage-backed securities unraveling worldwide and the global financial system shuddering to a halt. These developments, he said, could cripple or destroy hedge funds, investment banks and other major financial institutions like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.



As Roubini stepped down from the lectern after his talk, the moderator of the event said, "I think perhaps we will need a stiff drink after that." People laughed - and not without reason. At the time, unemployment and inflation remained low, and the economy, while weak, was still growing, despite rising oil prices and a softening housing market.



But Roubini was soon vindicated. In the year that followed, subprime lenders began entering bankruptcy, hedge funds began going under and the stock market plunged. There was declining employment, a deteriorating dollar, ever-increasing evidence of a huge housing bust and a growing air of panic in financial markets as the credit crisis deepened. By late summer, the Federal Reserve was rushing to the rescue, making the first of many unorthodox interventions in the economy, including cutting the lending rate by half a percentage point and buying up tens of billions of dollars in mortgage-backed securities.



Over the past year, whenever optimists have declared the worst of the U.S. economic crisis over, Roubini has countered with steadfast pessimism. In February, when the conventional wisdom held that the venerable investment firms of Wall Street would weather the crisis, Roubini warned that one or more of them would go "belly up" - and six weeks later, Bear Stearns collapsed.



After the Fed's further extraordinary actions in the spring - including making lines of credit available to selected investment banks and brokerage houses - many economists made note of the ensuing economic rally and proclaimed the credit crisis over and a recession averted. Roubini stuck to his script of "nightmare" events: waves of corporate bankruptcies, collapses in markets like commercial real estate and municipal bonds and, most alarming, the possible bankruptcy of a large regional or national bank that would lead to a panic by depositors. Not all of these developments have come to pass, but last month's demise of the California bank IndyMac - one of the largest such failures in U.S. history - drew only more attention to Roubini's seeming prescience.



As a result, Roubini, a respected but formerly obscure academic, has become a major figure in the public debate about the economy: the seer who saw it coming. He has been summoned to speak before Congress, the Council on Foreign Relations and the World Economic Forum at Davos, Switzerland. He is now a sought-after adviser, spending much of his time shuttling between meetings with central bank governors and finance ministers in Europe and Asia.



The mainstream economic establishment appears to be moving closer, however fitfully, to his way of seeing things. "I have in the last few months become more pessimistic than the consensus," Lawrence Summers, a former Treasury secretary, told me this year. "Certainly, Nouriel's writings have been a contributor to that."



On a cold and dreary day last winter, I met Roubini over lunch in New York City. "I'm not a pessimist by nature," he insisted. I found the assertion hard to credit. With a dour manner and an aura of gloom about him, Roubini gives the impression of being permanently pained, as if the burden of what he knows is almost too much for him to bear.



Roubini, who is 50, has been an outsider his entire life. He was born in Istanbul, the child of Iranian Jews, and his family moved to Tehran when he was 2, then to Tel Aviv and finally to Italy. He moved to the United States to pursue his doctorate in international economics at Harvard.



After completing his doctoral degree in 1988, Roubini joined the economics department at Yale, where he first met and began sharing ideas with Robert Shiller, the economist now known for his prescient warnings about the 1990s technology bubble.



The 1990s were an eventful time for an international economist like Roubini. Throughout the decade, one emerging economy after another was struck by crisis, beginning with Mexico's in 1994. Panics swept Asia, including Thailand, Indonesia and South Korea, in 1997 and 1998. The economies of Brazil and Russia imploded in 1998. Argentina's followed in 2000. Roubini began studying these countries and soon identified what he saw as their common weaknesses.



On the eve of the crises that befell them, he noticed, most had huge current-account deficits (meaning, basically, that they spent far more than they made), and they typically financed these deficits by borrowing from abroad in ways that exposed them to the national equivalent of bank runs. Most of these countries also had poorly regulated banking systems plagued by excessive borrowing and reckless lending. Corporate governance was often weak, with cronyism in abundance.



Roubini's work was distinguished not only by his conclusions but also by his approach. By making extensive use of transnational comparisons and historical analogies, he was employing a subjective, nontechnical framework, the sort embraced by popular economists like Paul Krugman, columnist for The New York Times, and the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz to reach a nonacademic audience.



Roubini takes pains to note that he remains a rigorous scholarly economist, but his approach is not the contemporary scholarly ideal in which an economist builds a model in order to constrain his subjective impressions and abide by a discrete set of data. The book that Roubini ultimately wrote (with the economist Brad Setser) on the emerging-market crises, "Bailouts or Bail-Ins?," contains not a single equation in its 400-plus pages.



After analyzing the markets that collapsed in the 1990s, Roubini set out to determine which country's economy would be the next to succumb to the same pressures. His surprising answer: the United States. Roubini was unnerved by what he saw in the U.S. economy, in particular its 2004 current-account deficit of $600 billion.



He began writing extensively about the dangers of that deficit and then branched out, researching the various effects of the credit boom - including the biggest housing bubble in the nation's history - that began after the Federal Reserve cut rates to close to zero in 2003. Roubini became convinced that the housing bubble was going to pop.



By late 2004 he had started to write about a "nightmare hard landing scenario for the United States." He predicted that foreign investors would stop financing the fiscal and current-account deficit and abandon the dollar, wreaking havoc on the economy.



What economic developments does Roubini see on the horizon? When Jim Nussle, the White House budget director, announced last month that the United States had "avoided a recession," Roubini was incredulous. For months, he has been predicting that the United States will suffer through an 18-month recession that will eventually rank as the "worst since the Great Depression." Though he is confident that the economy will enter a technical recovery toward the end of next year, he said job losses, corporate bankruptcies and other drags on growth would continue to take a toll for years.



Roubini has counseled various policy makers, including Federal Reserve governors and senior Treasury Department officials, to mount an aggressive response to the crisis. He applauded when the Fed cut interest rates to 2 percent from 5.25 percent beginning last summer. He also supported the Fed's willingness to engineer a takeover of Bear Stearns.



Roubini argues that the Fed's actions averted catastrophe, though he says he believes that future bailouts should focus on mortgage owners, not investors. Accordingly, he sees the choice facing the United States as stark but simple: either the government backs up a trillion-plus dollars' worth of high-risk mortgages (in exchange for the lenders' agreement to reduce monthly mortgage payments), or the banks and other institutions holding those mortgages - or the complex securities derived from them - go under.



"You either nationalize the banks or you nationalize the mortgages," he said. "Otherwise, they're all toast."



For months, Roubini has been arguing that the true cost of the housing crisis will not be a mere $300 billion - the amount allowed for by the housing legislation sponsored by Representative Barney Frank, Democrat of Massachusetts, and Senator Christopher Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut - but something between a trillion and a trillion and a half dollars. But most important, in Roubini's opinion, is to realize that the problem is deeper than the housing crisis.



"Reckless people have deluded themselves that this was a subprime crisis," he told me. "But we have problems with credit-card debt, student-loan debt, auto loans, commercial real estate loans, home-equity loans, corporate debt and loans that financed leveraged buyouts." All of these forms of debt, he argues, suffer from some or all of the same traits that first surfaced in the housing market: shoddy underwriting, securitization, negligence on the part of the credit-rating agencies and lax government oversight. "We have a subprime financial system," he said, "not a subprime mortgage market."



Roubini argues that most of the losses from this bad debt have yet to be written off, and the toll from bad commercial real estate loans alone may help send hundreds of local banks into the arms of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. "A good third of the regional banks won't make it," he predicted.



In turn, these bailouts will add hundreds of billions of dollars to an already gargantuan federal debt, and someone, somewhere, is going to have to finance that debt, along with all the other debt accumulated by consumers and corporations. "Our biggest financiers are China, Russia and the Gulf states," Roubini noted. "These are rivals, not allies." The United States, Roubini went on, will most likely muddle through the crisis but will emerge from it a different nation, with a different place in the world.



"Once you run current-account deficits, you depend on the kindness of strangers," he said, pausing to let out a resigned sigh. "This might be the beginning of the end of the American empire."



Stephen Mihm is an assistant professor of economic history at the University of Georgia.




http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/08/15/business/wbroubini.1.php



Comments (0)Leave a comment... To leave a comment on this posterous, please login.

Click here to login or sign up


이미 2년 전부터 대형 금융위기를 예언한(작년 여름까지도 조롱을 당하던) 뉴욕대 루비니 교수에 관한 글. 그가 얼마나 정확하게 맞춰 왔는지...


앞으로에 대해선 루비니의 얘기는...

앞으로 18개월 지속되는 위기가 올 것. 기술적으로는 내년 말에 회복이 시작되겠지만 기업의 도산, 실업의 증가는 계속될 것. 현재의 위기는 '서브프라임 모기지 위기'가 아니라 '서브프라임 체제의 위기', 즉 비슷한 모험적 금융을 펼친 모든 금융행위(credit-card debt, student-loan debt, auto loans, commercial real estate loans, home-equity loans, corporate debt and loans that financed leveraged buyouts.)가 모두 줄줄이 문제가 될 것.



List of Articles
번호 제목 글쓴이 날짜 조회 수
공지 [노동당 후원 안내] 노동당을 후원해 주세요 노동당 2017.11.08 83484
73498 [내일을 바꾸는 노동당] 노동당은 사회운동정당 "미래를 바꾼다" | 선거 공보물 소개 : 공약1 file 구교현선본 2015.09.02 2739
73497 기본소득과 이탈리아 연금제도의 비교 4 file 창호 2015.06.16 2738
73496 진보신당 통번역 길드 귀중 5 진중권 2009.02.26 2738
73495 다가올 전면전을 준비해야 할 듯.... 5 진중권 2008.08.13 2738
73494 [수원/오산/화성 당협] 8/31수 19:30, 2016 평등문화 프로그램 3회차 : 여성주의 file 서태성 2016.08.05 2737
73493 [승리!노선본 선거 2일차] 비정규직 차별 철폐, 이남신 후보와 함께. 노옥희 2008.03.28 2737
73492 <민중의소리> 이정무 기자 "한겨레.경향.오마이.프레시안, 진보진영 우습게 안다... 모르는 부분 과감하게 써" 4 임한솔 2011.06.14 2737
73491 한승수....? 누구세요...? 5 진중권 2009.04.07 2737
73490 [펌] 동작을은 노동당 김종철이 진보단일후보로 나서야 한다. 백스프 2014.07.09 2736
73489 미디어와 방사능 29 진중권 2008.10.08 2736
73488 노동당 부대표로 출마하는, 이근선의 출마의 변, 공약과 약력 21 file 이근선 2018.12.28 2735
73487 [여성위원회] 메이데이 브리핑 file 여성위원회 2016.05.04 2735
73486 진보신당과 학생 부문. 1 레온트로츠키 2008.03.06 2735
73485 노동당 2020 총선 슬로건 설문조사 file 노동당 2020.03.16 2734
73484 (탈당 대비책 비장의 카드 있'읍'니다) - 박근혜 인기 비밀 풀다 2 8 원시 2008.07.18 2734
73483 김성수 당원에게 이장규 2016.06.04 2733
73482 신노동당으로 좌파-대안정당연대를 통한 적록정치를 시작합시다 6 file 나도원 2018.08.29 2732
73481 노동절 사진 몇 장 4 박학룡 2008.05.02 2732
73480 희망뚜벅이 인천(2월4일) file 최완규 2012.02.05 2732
73479 [촛불력 69일] 7/5 비오는 날의 소풍? .. 1 2 2008.07.06 2731
73478 "어찌 소위 '종북세력'과도 함께 하나요?" 라는 질문에 대하여 1 홍명교 2015.01.15 2731
73477 [여성위원장 후보 김윤영] 울산과 경남 그리고 당진에서, 노동자 당원들께 file 유녕 2017.01.14 2731
73476 미래의 당권파가 공가실에 바칩니다 2 Code_G 2012.12.16 2731
73475 [6/15]3회 청소노동자 행진, "포기할 수 없는 꿈, 우리는 아직도 꿈을 꾼다" file 진보신당 2012.06.12 2731
73474 정말 부탁드립니다. 9 file 드림썬! 2015.07.16 2730
73473 사진 찾아가세요 - 봄소풍 사진 file 혀나수아 2008.04.27 2729
목록
Board Pagination Prev 1 ... 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ... 2956 Next
/ 2956